ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Social isolation risks and preventive strategies for residents in long-term care facilities in China: an interview-based study with staff in facilities.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial isolation is a significant challenge for residents in long-term care facilities. This study investigates the risk factors and predictive indicators of social isolation in these settings, aiming to enhance social connections and improve well-being.
methodsThis was a qualitative study. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from 12 long-term care facilities, and the data were analyzed using NVivo 10 software. Inductive analysis was used to identify key themes, which led to the development of a social isolation risk warning model and proposed prevention strategies.
resultsA total of 23 participants were interviewed, including 14 managers, 4 head nurses, 2 qualified nurses, and 3 healthcare assistants. In the risk warning model, social isolation risks were categorized into three domains: (1) Social isolation risks and influencing factors: Participants described limited social relationships, restricted social participation, and emotional distress as key risks, further compounded by insufficient family and peer support and weak social interaction skills. (2) Risk consequences and early warning interventions: Social isolation was perceived to contribute to declines in mental well-being and quality of life. Participants emphasized the need for risk assessment, focusing on anxiety、depression and emotional support level. They also highlighted training/education, including theoretical study and contingency plans, and suggested preventive measures such as family members' support and organizing group activities to foster social inclusion. (3) Challenges and solutions: Participants identified concerns about caregiver quality and scarce geriatric care resources as key barriers. They suggested human resource development and national policy support to strengthen workforce capacity and institutional care services.
conclusionsSocial isolation risk assessment plays a pivotal intermediate role in risk prevention. Evaluating relevant risk factors, comprehensive preventive measures could be developed and implemented to reduce the incidence of social isolation. This approach not only improves the psychological well-being of older adults but also enhances the safety and overall quality of care within long-term care facilities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: SQ2024049. Registered 15th March 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.