ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Exploring pleasure as a mediator of outcomes in music therapy.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Music Therapy for Reduction of Anhedonia: Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Pre-Post Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe experience of pleasure in music therapy has been underexplored. This paper examines the possibility that pleasure might mediate the effectiveness of music therapy interventions, particularly for individuals experiencing anhedonia (diminished ability to experience pleasure). We theorise this proposition by exploring music therapy processes and findings from two case studies involving people with anhedonia.
methodsAn interpretive case study approach was employed to generate explanations for observed outcomes. Following ethics approval, three participants meeting clinical criteria for anhedonia were recruited. Over four months, they engaged in tailored daily independent music activities focused on eliciting pleasure, supported by a music therapist. Multiple data sources were collected, including standardized anhedonia measures, daily ratings, interviews, and therapist observations.
resultsAll three participants showed improvements in anhedonia scores, with two moving into the normal range by study completion. Qualitative data revealed the importance of: 1) accessible and intentional pleasure-focused music activities; 2) therapeutic alliance providing guidance, psychoeducation and motivational support; and 3) participants' existing relationship with music as a historical source of pleasure. Specific therapeutic principles that facilitated outcomes are outlined.
conclusionsFindings suggest musical pleasure may be an important mediator of positive outcomes in music therapy, particularly for anhedonia. By overtly targeting pleasure through tailored music activities and therapeutic support, participants reconnected with musical pleasure, which generalised to improved hedonic capacity. Interacting dimensions of pleasure-focused musicking, the pleasure experience, and therapeutic scaffolding are proposed as key mechanisms. Implications for music therapy practice and future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.