ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025
Using automated insulin delivery to address the clinical challenges of glycemic management in people with type 1 diabetes and kidney failure on maintenance hemodialysis.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes management in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is complicated by altered insulin pharmacokinetics and glucose metabolism, particularly in the context of hemodialysis (HD). Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems offer dynamic insulin adjustment and may help address these challenges. We present real-world data from nine individuals (five females) with type 1 diabetes and ESKD on HD, median age 38 years (range 33-50). Over a median follow-up of 7 months (range 1.5-25), AID use led to significant improvements in glucose time in range (3.9-10 mmol/l) which increased from 39.7% to 59.8% (P = 0.001), glucose variability decreased from 39.8% to 33.8% (P = 0.01), and HbA1c improved from 78.6 to 56.1 mmol/mol (P = 0.003). Time below range fell from 4.0% to 1.4%, but this was not significant (P = 0.1). AID was well tolerated and implemented with multidisciplinary support. Our findings highlight the potential of AID to improve glycemic control in this high-risk population and the need for further studies in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.