SynthesisInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Preferences for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Understanding the Published Literature on the Value of Innovative Health Interventions.
Synthesis in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are ground-breaking genetic and cell/tissue-based therapies with the potential to treat and even cure myriad health conditions. However, they have faced multiple challenges in decision making with relatively low success in achieving reimbursement. The aim of this study was to review the published preference-based research on ATMPs to identify value attributes as a starting point in a research workstream aimed at understanding the true value of these innovative therapies. A literature review was used to identify studies across MedLine, Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Global Health, ProQuest Central, Social Sciences Premium Collection, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Econ Lit, Web of Science and SCOPUS from inception to 3rd March 2024. Search terms for genetic and cell/tissue-based therapies were conducted separately. Studies were included if they were a peer-reviewed primary research study or systematic literature review using stated preference measures to elicit preferences for ATMPs. Thirteen studies were included with 8 pertaining to genetic therapies and 5 to cell/tissue therapies. Attributes of value were similar across the studies and ATMP categories. Attributes were grouped into the following for genetic therapies: clinical benefits, uncertainty, risk, treatment burden, and quality of life; for cell/tissue therapies clinical benefit, uncertainty, risk and treatment burden. There is limited research on the preferences for ATMPs; but these findings suggest that the value attributes of ATMPs are consistent across gene and cell/tissue therapies with clinical benefit, uncertainty, risk, treatment burden, and quality of life being important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.