ArticleChemical senses2025
Odor-evoked food neophobia and attenuation in mice.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals, including humans, exhibit caution when encountering novel foods, a phenomenon known as food neophobia. This hesitancy decreases with repeated exposures, provided the food is perceived as safe. While extensive research has established rodent models of food neophobia using fluid consumption tasks, studies using solid foods, particularly in mice, are relatively limited. We investigated food neophobia in mice using an olfactory-based task in which the mice were given chow odorized with isoamyl acetate. We quantified several behaviors associated with novelty response and found that the time to begin eating is the most reliable measure of neophobia. Similar levels of neophobia were found using other monomolecular odorants, suggesting that the effect is not odor specific. Further, as some reports of food neophobia in humans have suggested sex differences, we compared food neophobia behaviors in male and female mice. We observed no significant differences between the 2 groups, suggesting that the behavioral expression of food neophobia is similar across sexes. Finally, we found that food neophobia is attenuated upon a second exposure, as mice consume the odorized food as quickly as nonodorized food. Overall, our findings highlight a simple, single-test session approach for exploring olfactory-driven food neophobia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.