ArticleDiabetologia2026
Heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed type 1 diabetes: characterising a unique cohort with maintained C-peptide secretion in Ghana.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunophenotypic insights into diabetes heterogeneity: The role of CD25-expressing T cells in Ghanaian type 1 diabetes cohorts.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Article
- The central role of the β-cell in diabetes: from monogenic forms to type 1, type 2, and gestational diabetes.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisIn sub-Saharan Africa, type 1 diabetes is typically diagnosed clinically, which can be challenging due to atypical diabetes presentations such as ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes or type 2 diabetes in the absence of overweight and obesity. C-peptide, a marker of residual insulin secretion capacity, is crucial for understanding these variations but understudied in the region. Here, we investigated whether C-peptide measurement and concomitant genetic, autoimmune and metabolic characterisation of individuals with clinically diagnosed type 1 diabetes confirm diabetes classification and highlight population-specific features.
methodsIn this case-control study from Ghana, we recruited 266 individuals with clinically diagnosed and insulin-treated long-term type 1 diabetes and 266 healthy control individuals. We compared clinical features, HLA class II haplotypes, autoantibodies, and inflammatory and metabolic serum profiles across control and patient groups classified by random C-peptide levels: low (<0.2 nmol/l), mid (0.2-0.6 nmol/l) and high (>0.6 nmol/l).
resultsOnly 28.9% of individuals with clinically diagnosed type 1 diabetes had low C-peptide concentrations. They were the youngest and leanest group, with higher frequencies of HLA class II risk haplotypes and GAD and ZnT8 autoantibodies compared with all other groups. By contrast, 34.6% and 36.5% had mid-range or high C-peptide levels, respectively. These subgroups resembled the control group in terms of low autoantibody titres and one protective HLA class II haplotype. Ketosis at onset was most prevalent in individuals with high C-peptide. Serum proinflammatory biomarkers differed between individuals with diabetes and control participants, but not between C-peptide subgroups. Aromatic and branched-chain amino acids varied between diabetes subgroups and positively correlated with C-peptide levels. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationMaintained C-peptide levels in two-thirds of individuals with long-term type 1 diabetes in Ghana, combined with the absence of autoantibodies and HLA risk association, highlight the necessity for better differentiation from atypical diabetes presentations to optimise patient care and improve health outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.