Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41176327›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2025

The Effect of Health Literacy Interventions on Self-management in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.

María-Francisca Cabezas, Gabriela Nazar, Adelita V Ranchor, Coby Annema

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors associated with self-care engagement among oesophageal and gastric cancer survivors: a population-based cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

María-Francisca CabezasUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Health Psychology Section, PO Box 30.001 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-7612
Gabriela NazarUniversidad de Concepción, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Concepción, 4030000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6410-6838
Adelita V RanchorUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Health Psychology Section, PO Box 30.001 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-3771
Coby AnnemaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Nursing Science, PO Box 30.001 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8663-2145

Funding

Chilean Government for doing her PhD (National Agency for Research and Development, ANID-Becas Chile 72230093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients need cognitive and social skills in order to be able to make informed healthcare decisions. Health literacy (HL) encompasses these skills, enabling individuals to manage their conditions and adapt to challenges. HL interventions in patients could be a powerful way of optimizing self-management (SM) in individuals with chronic diseases. PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of HL interventions on the medical, emotional, and role management domains of SM, theoretical foundations, conceptualizations of HL and SM, and intervention components.

methodsHealth literacy interventions aimed at increasing SM in adults (≥18 years) with chronic diseases were considered. A database search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), and Web of Science from 2014 to 2024. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist.

resultsFourteen studies were included. Interventions improved 3 components of medical management: medication adherence, disease knowledge, and self-efficacy. However, the effects on adherence to diet and exercise regimens, also part of medical management, were inconclusive. Emotional and role management received limited attention. There was inconsistency between HL definitions and instruments. Most interventions were delivered through in-person sessions. Overall, studies showed moderate risk of bias, which may have influenced the results.

conclusionsTheory-based interventions, methodological consistency, and comprehensive HL and SM measures are needed to understand interventions' effectiveness. To support behavioral change, HL interventions must address emotional and role management. Future high-quality research is required to determine optimal strategies for strengthening SM through HL interventions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracySelf-ManagementChronic DiseaseHumansSelf Efficacychronic diseaseshealth literacyinterventionself-managementsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41176327
PMCPMC12579557

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.