ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Deep learning for accurate tumour volume measurement and prediction of therapy response in paediatric osteosarcoma.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess treatment response in osteosarcoma, two automated convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to quantify tumour volumes and predict response to induction chemotherapy using histopathology as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, multicentre study included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from osteosarcoma patients acquired between January 2006 and July 2024. A 3D U-Net CNN segmented tumours and calculated volumes at baseline and post-chemotherapy. A second CNN predicted treatment response based on MRI-derived tumour volume changes using histopathologic necrosis (≥ 90%) as the reference standard. Both models were trained on 162 scans from 81 patients (Centre A) and validated on 40 scans from 20 patients (10 per centre) with Centre B as the external test set. Human readers measured 3D tumour diameters and volumes, compared with CNN-derived volumes using Spearman's correlation, Bland-Altman plots, and Dice coefficients. Prediction performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with significance determined by agreement metrics.
resultsPatients from Centre A had a mean age of 15 ± 5 years (52 males), and from Centre B a mean age of 13 ± 0 years (8 males). CNN- and human-derived tumour volumes showed strong correlation (Centre A: r = 0.98, Centre B: r = 0.95; p < 0.001). Dice coefficients were 0.86 (Centre A) and 0.81 (Centre B), with median Hausdorff distances of 15.0 mm and 14.2 mm. The response prediction model classified 16/20 cases (80% accuracy) with 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity.
conclusionCNN-derived tumour volume measurements were comparable to human assessments. CNN-based volume changes predicted histopathologic response to chemotherapy in paediatric osteosarcoma. KEY POINTS: Question Accurate, noninvasive assessment of treatment response in paediatric osteosarcoma is limited by its reliance on manual tumour measurements and post-surgical histopathology. Findings Automated deep learning accurately measured tumour volumes on MRI and predicted chemotherapy response with 80% accuracy, 90% sensitivity, and 70% specificity. Clinical relevance Automated deep learning enables accurate tumour volume assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in paediatric osteosarcoma, offering a noninvasive tool to support and refine patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.