ArticleMolecular horticulture2025
Efficient genome editing in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae using the CRISPR/FnCas12a system.
Article in Molecular horticulture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Efficient genome editing in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae using the CRISPR/FnCas12a system.Molecular horticulture · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-based gene editing has rarely been studied in plant pathogens. In this report, the CRISPR/FnCas12a system was successfully established for gene editing in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), which causes bacterial canker (BC) of kiwifruit. The system was constructed in a Psa-suitable vector pBBR1-MCS2 to edit hopH1 or/and hopZ5, which encode effectors only present in Psa biovar 3 (Psa3) responsible for BC pandemic in kiwifruit worldwide. Two different CRISPR RNAs (crRNA) were designed to edit either hopH1 or/and hopZ5, and two different sets of PCR primers were used to screen deletions of the target genes and the presence of the vector in Psa. The deletion in Psa was impacted by the position of the DNAs targeted by the crRNAs. The vector-eliminated mutant could receive the editing system iteratively. Interestingly, the double mutant ΔhopZ5ΔhopH1 showed significantly stronger virulence than the wild-type Psa on Actinidia eriantha cv. White (resistant to BC), but weak virulence on A. chinensis cv. Hongyang (highly susceptible to BC), respectively, suggesting that hopH1 or/and hopZ5 potentially matches an unknown resistance gene in White. In summary, we have established the CRISPR/FnCas12a genome-editing system to probe gene function in the pathogen and to explore effector-target interactions in kiwifruit-Psa-pathosyetem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.