Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41177938›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2025

Diabetes-Related Foot Disease in South Asians Living in Western Countries: Burden, Outcomes, and Gaps in the Literature-A Scoping Review Protocol.

Uroosa R Khan, David A Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uroosa R KhanDepartment of Podiatry, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8453-8711
David A RussellLeeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) NIHR203331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In England, diabetes-related foot ulcers and related amputations equate to approximately 1% of the National Health Service budget. Most of these costs are related to hospital admissions with diabetes-related foot ulcers, found to be 8.04 days longer when compared to those without ulcers. Although South Asian (SA) populations living in Western countries experience disproportionately high diabetes rates, they exhibit significantly lower prevalence of diabetes-related foot ulcers and lower-limb amputations compared to White European populations. This paradox remains underexplored, necessitating a scoping review to map existing evidence, elucidate disparities, and identify gaps. To explore the burden of diabetes-related foot ulcers among South Asians living in Western countries by examining their incidence, prevalence, and predisposing factors. Assessing clinical outcomes and lived experiences during the ulcerative phase and reviewing existing literature on recurrence and long-term post-healing complications. Following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in line preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted across databases, and registered with open science framework. This will be the first scoping review to map diabetes-related foot ulcers burden among South Asians in Western settings. Clarifying incidence and outcome disparities, highlighting research gaps, and suggesting directions for future studies.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDiabetic FootSouth Asian PeopleFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceScoping Reviews as Topicamputationdiabetes mellitusdiabetic feetscoping reviewwounds

Identifiers

PMID41177938
PMCPMC12580216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.