ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Real-world incidence and risk factors of level 3 (severe) hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes (iNPHORM, United States).
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world incidence and risk factors of level 3 (severe) hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes (iNPHORM, United States).Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsLevel 3 (severe) hypoglycaemia is a serious, yet preventable, complication of insulin- or secretagogue-treated diabetes. However, real-world insight into its incidence and risk factors remains limited. We analysed data from the iNPHORM study to address this gap. MATERIALS AND
methodsiNPHORM is a prospective internet panel survey of US adults (aged 18-90) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or insulin- and/or secretagogue-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). A screener, baseline and 12-monthly follow-up questionnaires captured data on Level 3 hypoglycaemia and participant characteristics. Crude incidence proportions and annualized event rates were calculated. Repeated LASSO selection and negative binomial regression identified risk factors, with separate models for T1D and T2D.
resultsAmong 985 participants (T1D: 16.7%), 35.0% experienced ≥1 Level 3 event over follow-up (T1D: 45.0%; T2D: 33.0%). The annualized rate was 4.98 EPPY (T1D: 3.56; T2D: 5.26). In T1D, rates were higher among individuals identifying as non-White (RR [rate ratio]: 2.03), with prior diabetes ketoacidosis (RR: 6.49), and greater fear of hypoglycaemia (RR: 1.41). Prior diabetes education (RR: 0.42) was protective. In T2D, rates were higher with younger age (RR: 0.77 per 10-year increase), greater fear of hypoglycaemia (RR: 1.18), more diabetes complications, higher secretagogue dose, more diabetes visits (RR: 1.72), longer use of continuous/flash glucose monitoring, impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and a greater number of past healthcare-requiring severe hypoglycaemia (RR: 1.12).
conclusionsLevel 3 hypoglycaemia remains common in T1D and T2D. Findings support risk-targeted prevention and diabetes care strategies that co-prioritize safety and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.