Evidence mapPaperPMID 41178905Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2025

Direction of global health status: a narrative review and recommendation for incorporating integrative medicine for improvement.

George Vithoulkas, Seema Mahesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George VithoulkasUniversity of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece.
Seema MaheshInternational Academy of Classical Homeopathy, Alonissos, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional medicine has made significant advancements in the past century, yet the global burden of chronic degenerative diseases has continued to rise impressively. Are we healthier than we were a hundred years ago? A narrative review focusing on the direction global health has taken under modern medicine was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, WHO, and CDC databases. The retrieved studies yielded additional historical data, which was also included. The bigger picture emerging from these sources is presented in a narrative form. Our review of historical and current medical literature suggests an alarming worsening of health status in the overall population, with a shift from infectious diseases to chronic debilitating conditions, including serious immune, neurological, and psychiatric illnesses. The countries with well-established healthcare systems are experiencing a higher burden of chronic degenerative diseases. It appears that the healthcare approach has focused on specific aspects rather than considering the complete picture of human health. We propose that healthcare innovations should refocus on studying the individual in their environment as an integral entity and conduct research to understand the long-term effects of medicines and vaccines. Further, integrating complementary and alternative medicine systems that consider health and disease holistically is recommended for incorporation into healthcare. However, it is emphasized that theoretical scientific research in this area remains limited, and there is a growing call for research in complementary medicine healthcare innovations, which, if executed well, may benefit living beings.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth StatusIntegrative MedicineComplementary TherapiesHumanscomplementary and alternative medicinegeographical trendsglobal healthhealth statustime trends

Identifiers

PMID41178905
PMCPMC12577778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.