Evidence mapPaperPMID 41179064Full record

ArticleCureus2025

An Unusual Case of Elevated Testosterone: When Testosterone by Dialysis Saves the Day.

Dave K Garg, Run Yu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dave K GargInternal Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Run YuMedicine/Endocrinology, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case reviews an uncommon clinical scenario in which a markedly elevated total testosterone was detected in the setting of a complaint of hair loss in a male. Clinically, the patient had no other manifestations of elevated testosterone and did not have any notable supplement use that would explain such aberrant values. Due to concerns for potential malignancy, imaging was pursued that failed to show a source. Given the discordance in his lab values and his workup, a testosterone by dialysis was pursued that returned with reassuringly normal range testosterone levels, highlighting the impact of varied testosterone-protein binding affinity among humans and the ongoing value of equilibrium dialysis as a laboratory technique.

Indexed as

assay interferencebindingbioavailable testosteronelab interpretationserum total testosteronesex hormone binding globulin

Identifiers

PMID41179064
PMCPMC12575005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.