ArticleAfrican health sciences2025
Demographic predictors on traditional prenatal service uptake among rural Zimbabwean pregnant women.
Article in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Work in progress on infections, reproductive sexual health, education and non-communicable diseases.African health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify demographic predictors influencing the uptake of traditional prenatal care among pregnant women in rural Zimbabwe to inform maternal health policies and programming. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Goromonzi District, focusing on Wards 1, 3, and 6. A census approach recruited 867 pregnant women identified through community health workers. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using binary logistic regression to evaluate the influence of demographic predictors, including age, education, income, employment, parity, marital status, religion, and health complications. Results: Half (50%) of respondents reported using traditional prenatal services, with 80% preferring a combination of traditional and conventional care. Significant predictors included African Traditional Religion (ATR) (OR = 19.144, p = 0.008), parity (OR = 12.962, p = 0.004), low income (OR = 9.991, p = 0.004), informal employment (OR = 5.134, p < 0.001), and primary education (OR = 5.966, p = 0.006). The model explained 48.4% of the variance in traditional care adoption (Nagelkerke R Conclusion: Integrated maternal health approaches respecting cultural practices, subsidized maternal services, and collaboration with traditional birth attendants could enhance maternal health outcomes in rural Zimbabwe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.