Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Bridge symptoms of depression and anxiety among older adults in China: a longitudinal network comparison by living arrangements.

Hao Xu, Xiaowen Li, Cui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao XuSchool of Physical Education, Sichuan Institute of Industrial Technology, Deyang, China.
Xiaowen LiSchool of Physical Education, Sichuan Institute of Industrial Technology, Deyang, China.
Cui LiuScience and Technology Department, Sichuan Institute of Industrial Technology, Deyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comorbidity of depression and anxiety is highly prevalent among older adults, yet longitudinal evidence on how different living arrangements shape the interactions between these symptoms remains scarce. Methods: Data were drawn from the 2011, 2014, and 2018 waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Participants aged ≥60 years who completed both the CES-D-10 and GAD-7 were included. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) on key demographic variables, the final analytic sample comprised 834 older adults. Bayesian Gaussian Graphical Models were applied to construct contemporaneous and lag-1 temporal networks. Bridge edges linking depressive and anxiety clusters were identified, and group differences were examined using the Network Comparison Test (NCT). Results: The mean age of the sample was 84.5 years; 61.7% were female, and 84.5% held rural hukou. In the overall sample, the strongest bridge edge was between CESD10 (poor sleep quality) and GAD1 (feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge) ( Conclusions: Living arrangements shape the bridge-symptom mechanisms linking depressive and anxiety symptoms in later life. Interventions for older adults living alone should prioritize improving sleep, whereas those for older adults living with family should emphasize emotional regulation and family support. These findings provide longitudinal, network-based evidence on context-specific comorbidity mechanisms and offer empirical guidance for tailored public health and clinical interventions.

Indexed as

depression and anxietyliving arrangementmental health in older adultsnetwork comparison test (NCT)propensity score matching (PSM)symptom network analysis

Identifiers

PMID41179821
PMCPMC12575297

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.