ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Machine learning-based predictive model for immune checkpoint inhibitors response in gastrointestinal cancers.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven big data analysis and predictive modeling of infectious disease immunity: from correlates to causal, multiscale understanding.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers present significant clinical challenges characterized by dismal survival outcomes and suboptimal prognoses. Currently, only partial indicators are available to predict the response of immunotherapy. A critical gap remains in the development of models capable of accurately predicting response rates to immunotherapy regimens. In this study, we developed a machine-learning (ML) model based on factorial, molecular, demographic, and clinical data to predict the response rate. Methods: This multicentre retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 506 patients, comprising 352 cases collected from Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and Hubei Cancer Hospital, along with 154 cases obtained from the publicly available dataset of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital. We used 14 features as input features, such as the patient's basic status, biochemical test results, and genetic test results. Eight ML methods were employed to build predictive models. Through rigorous validation using seven discriminative performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and Brier score), the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated superior predictive capability. Model interpretability was subsequently enhanced through Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) analysis to elucidate feature contributions. Results: We selected XGBoost with the best predictive performance to predict response (AUC: 0.829 [95% CI: 0.72-0.91], accuracy: 78.43%, sensitivity: 86.67%, specificity: 72.31%). The Delong test and calibration curve indicated that XGBoost significantly outperformed the other models in prediction. The SHAP values indicate that chemotherapy contributes the most to the model's predictive accuracy (contribution score = 0.28), while Ki-67 exhibits the lowest contribution rate (0.01). In addition, the study showed that chemotherapy, higher hemoglobin (HGB), body mass index (BMI), age, lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and tumor stage positively influenced the output of the model. Conclusion: Interpretable XGBoost models have shown accuracy, efficiency, and robustness in determining the association between input features and response rates. Among the input features, chemotherapy and tumor stage played the most important role in the prediction model. Due to the varying efficacy of ICIs in gastrointestinal cancers, personalized predictive models can greatly assist clinical decision-making. This model fills this gap in clinical practice and can provide more precise support for personalized treatment and risk avoidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.