Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Comparative study of ciprofol vs. propofol in carotid endarterectomy: focusing on mean arterial pressure, vasoactive drug use, and postoperative complications.

Xinxin Zheng, Shiyun Deng, Lu Tian, Yanqing Zhang, Lin Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinxin ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, University-Town Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shiyun DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, University-Town Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lu TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, University-Town Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yanqing Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, University-Town Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lin Bai *Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ciprofol and propofol on mean arterial pressure (MAP) management, vasoactive drug usage, and postoperative complications after carotid endarterectomy. Methods: A total of 103 patients were included in either the ciprofol ( Results: In terms of primary outcomes, the ciprofol group exhibited a higher MAP at T3 (before the skin incision; Conclusion: These findings suggest that ciprofol offers advantages over propofol during carotid endarterectomy by optimizing MAP control, minimizing vasopressor use, and mitigating postoperative complications. Ciprofol may be the preferable anesthetic agent in carotid artery-related procedures. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2500104162.

Indexed as

anesthesiacarotid endarterectomyciprofolmean arterial pressurepropofol

Identifiers

PMID41179890
PMCPMC12575303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.