ArticleCochrane evidence synthesis and methods2025
Health Equity in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial-Part 1 Getting Started With Health Equity in Your Review.
Article in Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PRO EDI-A Tool to Help Systematic Reviewers Make Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Assessments.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Article
- Correction to "Health Equity in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial-Part 1 Getting Started With Health Equity in Your Review", "Health Equity in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial-Part 2 Implementing Health Equity Throughout Your Methods", "Meta-Analysis Using Time-to-Event Data: A Tutorial" and "Split Body Trials in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: A Tutorial".Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This tutorial focuses on how to get started with considering health equity in systematic reviews of interventions. We will explain why health equity should be considered, how to frame your question, and which interest-holders to engage. This is the first tutorial in a series on health equity. The second tutorial focuses on implementing health equity methods in your review.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.