Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180321›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Resilience Among Wife and Husband Caregivers of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Haiyan Sun, Zichun Zheng, Pornpat Hengudomsub, Chintana Wacharasin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haiyan SunSchool of Nursing Jiangsu Medical College Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-9724
Zichun ZhengDepartment of Internal Medicine Yancheng Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4499-0976
Pornpat HengudomsubFaculty of Nursing Burapha University Saen Suk Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7078-4037
Chintana WacharasinFaculty of Nursing Burapha University Saen Suk Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1266-6120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Resilience in spousal caregivers plays a crucial role in safeguarding mental well-being. Moreover, resilience in female and male caregivers may be influenced by distinct factors when caring for patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to investigate and compare risk and protective factors of resilience among husbands and wives of patients with advanced cancer in China. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 360 spouses of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer from January to June 2022 in China, including 154 husbands and 206 wives. The participants reported on resilience levels, patient functional status, social support, coping self-efficacy, mutuality, and caregiver burden. Multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the influential factors of resilience. Results: Wives of patients with advanced cancer demonstrated higher overall resilience levels (54.92 ± 8.07) than those of husbands (53.42 ± 6.80), although without statistical significance. However, wives exhibited a higher level than husbands in the tenacity dimension ( Conclusion: The present study emphasized different factors of resilience between spouses of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer. Current results can be used to develop gender-specific interventions for resilience in spousal caregivers of patients with serious illness during early treatment stages.

Indexed as

advanced cancercaregiverhusbandresiliencewife

Identifiers

PMID41180321
PMCPMC12573275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.