ArticleSleep science and practice2025
Piloting a brief digital behavioral intervention for adolescent sleep.
Article in Sleep science and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05808179 (Passive Phototherapy to Improve Sleep in Teens), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Passive Phototherapy to Improve Sleep in Teens
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescents worldwide suffer from inadequate sleep duration. Much of the sleep curtailment is secondary to going to sleep late and awakening early to get to school. While several interventions to shift bedtimes to an early hour have been proposed, many are not readily disseminable. The purpose of this study was to pilot the application of a digital behavioral intervention on adolescent sleep timing and subsequent effects on mood. Methods: Over a 10-week period, we studied fourteen healthy adolescents (M age = 16.1 years, SD = 1.4, 50% female) who wanted to go to sleep at an earlier hour. After a two-week baseline, participants were randomly assigned to an eight-week active or placebo light therapy condition. During the first four weeks of intervention, both groups additionally received the digital behavioral intervention, which included elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), values-based clarification, and motivational interviewing. The intervention consisted of 19 short core videos and four optional values-based videos. Results: Sleep logs showed that post-intervention, as compared to baseline, both groups went to sleep earlier (CBT + active light: 7.70 ± 45.8 min; CBT + sham light: 24.8 ± 39.1 min) and slept longer (CBT + active light: 13.0 ± 47.3 min; CBT + sham light: 47.8 ± 74.6 min). Sleep latency decreased slightly in the CBT + active light (3.47 ± 9.07 min) and increased in the CBT + sham light (8.78 ± 18.2 min). Self-reported sleep quality supported these findings. No changes were observed in depressive symptoms or emotion regulation. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that the current digital behavioral intervention improves self-reported measures of sleep. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to fully assess the intervention's efficacy and long-term effects. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov #NCT05808179.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.