ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
A case of bilateral oophorectomy in a 40-day-old female due to a misdiagnosis of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Bilateral oophorectomy in females is rarely performed in the pediatric population due to its serious physical and mental long-term consequences on both the patients and their parents, which make it very complicated to manage. Case presentation: A 13-year-old female was referred to our pediatric clinic for evaluation of short stature and the absence of secondary sexual characteristics. As part of her past medical history, she underwent a bilateral oophorectomy that was performed along with a bilateral hernia repair at the age of 40 days due to misdiagnosis as complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS). The patient was initially started on transdermal hormonal replacement therapy and then replaced by oral treatment. A follow-up was planned every 6 months with a good response to the treatment regarding the development of secondary sexual characteristics and the satisfactory final height. Clinical discussion: The girl underwent bilateral oophorectomy after a misdiagnosis of CAIS without proper diagnostic procedures, leading to medicolegal and ethical issues. Karyotyping is necessary for the diagnosis of CAIS. The adolescent received hormonal replacement therapy and had a follow-up of her growth and sexual development. The concept of oocyte donation was also discussed with the family. Conclusion: Performing a karyotype and a complete hormonal workup is essential in any suspicion of CAIS in a phenotypically female infant to avoid making such an error. Performing the gonadectomy after sexual maturation is achieved in CAIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.