ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Budd-Chiari syndrome: Prognostic scores, special populations, and management challenges.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This editorial narrative review discussed Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), which represents a rare but critical vascular liver disease resulting in an obstruction of hepatic venous outflow. Despite having a unifying mechanism, the syndrome shows a large heterogeneity across presentation, cause, and disease trajectory, complicating diagnosis and management. Based on established prognostic scoring systems, the New Clichy Score, the BCS-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt Index, the Zeitoun Score, and the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease score were examined. These scoring systems are used for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making. Although these models deliver suitability information, their static parameters, narrow validation, and limited generalizability reduce their usefulness in diverse populations. Specific challenges are highlighted in pediatric patients, pregnant females, and individuals with myeloproliferative neoplasms for whom current tools often fall short. Moreover, there remains uncertainty regarding the durability of Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease score response and longer-term risks, such as hepatocellular carcinoma. There is a need to have a dynamic prognostic model that uses imaging and genetic factors in future studies. The article discussed enhancing recruitment to improve research. Overall, this article provided a contemporary, evidence-based approach for clinicians to aid in the evaluation and treatment of BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.