Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180907›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of radiology2025

Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response: Imaging findings and criteria.

Francesco Agnello, Adele Taibbi, Massimo Galia, Alessia Orlando, Cesare Gagliardo, Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco AgnelloDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy.
Adele TaibbiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy.
Massimo GaliaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy.
Alessia OrlandoDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy.
Cesare GagliardoDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy.
Tommaso Vincenzo BartolottaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy. tommasovincenzo.bartolotta@unipa.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays a crucial role in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment response. Contrast enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with extra-cellular or hepatobiliary contrast agents are the imaging techniques of choice. Contrast enhanced ultrasound is a promising technique. In this paper, we describe radiological techniques, imaging findings after HCC treatment, and the criteria of response evaluation. The utility of the structured report is also evaluated.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLiver Imaging Reporting and Data SystemModified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1Structured reportTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID41180907
PMCPMC12576714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.