ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Advancements in biodegradable implants: evaluation in large animal surgical models.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interface-Enhanced Mg/PLA Composite with Superior Mechanical, Biodegradable and Biocompatible Properties for Orthopedic Implants.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodegradable implants significantly advance regenerative medicine and orthopedic surgery, offering temporary mechanical support while facilitating natural tissue regeneration. Unlike permanent implants, biodegradable materials eliminate the need for secondary removal surgeries, reducing patient risk and healthcare costs. Recent innovations in biomaterials - such as magnesium-based alloys, polymeric composites, and bio-ceramics - have led to the development of implants with enhanced biocompatibility, controlled degradation rates, and improved mechanical performance. Additionally, the advent of 3D (three-dimensions) printing and additive manufacturing has enabled the creation of patient-specific scaffolds with complex geometries tailored for optimized tissue integration. Evaluating these implants in large animal surgical models, including pigs, sheep, and goats, is critical for bridging the gap between laboratory research and human clinical applications. These models provide anatomical and physiological parallels to human systems, offering valuable insights into implant behavior, degradation kinetics, tissue response, and functional outcomes under realistic biomechanical conditions. However, species-specific differences and variability in healing responses present ongoing challenges in directly translating findings. Emerging technologies, such as smart implants embedded with biosensors, bioactive surface coatings, and artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic tools, continue to enhance implant functionality and monitoring capabilities. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in achieving optimal degradation profiles, managing inflammatory responses, and maintaining mechanical integrity throughout the healing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.