Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181418›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Advancements in biodegradable implants: evaluation in large animal surgical models.

Smita Lata, Sagar Mondal, Richa Mishra, Swati Priya, Ravi K Deshwal, Shailendra Thapliyal, Nayan Talukdar, Archna Dhasmana, Sarvesh Rustagi, Jutishna Bora and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Smita LataAmity Institute Biotechnology, Amity University Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Sagar MondalAmity Institute Biotechnology, Amity University Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Richa MishraDepartment of Computer Engineering, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Swati PriyaAmity Institute Biotechnology, Amity University Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Ravi K DeshwalInstitute of Bioscience and Technology, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shailendra ThapliyalSchool of Agriculture, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Nayan TalukdarProgram of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Assam down town University, Guwahati, India.
Archna DhasmanaHimalayan School of Biosciences Swami Rama University, Dehradun, India.
Sarvesh RustagiDepartment of Food Technology, School of Agriculture, Maya Devi University, Dehradun, Uttrakhand, India.
Jutishna BoraAmity Institute Biotechnology, Amity University Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Sumira MalikAmity Institute Biotechnology, Amity University Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-1493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodegradable implants significantly advance regenerative medicine and orthopedic surgery, offering temporary mechanical support while facilitating natural tissue regeneration. Unlike permanent implants, biodegradable materials eliminate the need for secondary removal surgeries, reducing patient risk and healthcare costs. Recent innovations in biomaterials - such as magnesium-based alloys, polymeric composites, and bio-ceramics - have led to the development of implants with enhanced biocompatibility, controlled degradation rates, and improved mechanical performance. Additionally, the advent of 3D (three-dimensions) printing and additive manufacturing has enabled the creation of patient-specific scaffolds with complex geometries tailored for optimized tissue integration. Evaluating these implants in large animal surgical models, including pigs, sheep, and goats, is critical for bridging the gap between laboratory research and human clinical applications. These models provide anatomical and physiological parallels to human systems, offering valuable insights into implant behavior, degradation kinetics, tissue response, and functional outcomes under realistic biomechanical conditions. However, species-specific differences and variability in healing responses present ongoing challenges in directly translating findings. Emerging technologies, such as smart implants embedded with biosensors, bioactive surface coatings, and artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic tools, continue to enhance implant functionality and monitoring capabilities. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in achieving optimal degradation profiles, managing inflammatory responses, and maintaining mechanical integrity throughout the healing process.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybiodegradable implantslarge animalspolyglycolic acidpolylactic acid

Identifiers

PMID41181418
PMCPMC12577823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.