Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183282›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue

Optimal model for predicting intraoperative blood transfusion in elective surgery patients: a comparative study of eight machine learning methods.

Min Li, Jialing Lin, Hui Du, Wei Jiang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min LiDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Sichuan Tianfu New Area People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Jialing LinDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Sichuan Tianfu New Area People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Hui DuDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Sichuan Tianfu New Area People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Sichuan Tianfu New Area People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo identify the optimal machine learning model for predicting intraoperative blood transfusion requirements in elective surgery patients by systematically evaluating eight algorithms. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective cohort of 1,500 elective surgery patients was screened, with 1,017 meeting inclusion criteria. Demographic (gender, age, height, weight), preoperative (liver, cardiac, pulmonary, coagulation functions), and intraoperative indicators (surgery grade, anesthesia score, estimated blood loss, vital signs) were collected. After univariate analysis, 20 significant variables were selected for modeling. The dataset was split 7:3 into training and testing sets. Eight models -Random Forest (RF), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Network (NNet), λ determined by cross-validation (LASSO), and Decision Tree (DT)- were trained using five-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision-recall curves (PR-AUC), residuals, and variable importance.

resultsIn the training set, RF achieved the highest AUC (1.000), followed by GBM (0.992) and SVM (0.987). In the testing set, RF maintained superior performance (AUC=0.992), with high precision-recall (AUC-PR=0.988) and minimal residuals. Key predictors included preoperative hemoglobin (preHGB), EBL, and coagulation markers (preAPTT, preDD). DISCUSSION: RF is the most reliable model for intraoperative transfusion prediction, offering high accuracy and clinical interpretability. This study provides a data-driven tool to optimize transfusion strategies and reduce adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionElective Surgical ProceduresMachine LearningAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41183282
PMCPMC12962862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.