ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting low birth weight in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women's Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Risk Stratification Using a Precision and Personalized Framework Embedded with an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predicting macrosomia and low birth weight with interpretable machine learning.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow birth weight (LBW), defined as a newborn weighing less than 2500 g, is an increasingly significant public health concern. Exploring the risk and protective factors for LBW is getting more and more important. This study aimed to utilize predictive models to identify the critical factors associated with LBW in singleton pregnancies.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Binzhou Medical University Hospital, China, from 2022 to 2023. Singleton pregnancies with gestational age exceeding 27 weeks were included, while multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies were excluded. Logistic regression (LR) model and four machine learning (ML) algorithms were tested(random forest, light gradient boosting machine, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting). The LR model was interpreted through odds ratio analysis and clinical nomogram visualization. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret the importance and impact of individual features on ML model.
resultsIn this cohort of 10,227 deliveries, 237 cases were classified as LBW. The XGBoost model exhibited superior performance in predicting LBW, with an AUC of 0.786 (training set) and 0.741 (test set, ) AUPRC of 0.350 and 0.186, respectively. Both LR and XGBoost model identified maternal age, gestational age, BMI, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), fetal distress as the critical factor. Additionally, a follow-up study on LBW found that LBW infants prone to significant health challenges, such as a high rate of hospitalization and the complex conditions including congenital anomalies, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that the LR and XGBoost model exhibited clinically meaningful predictive performance in identifying factors associated with LBW in singleton pregnancies. Pregnant women with a gestational age of less than 37 weeks, a gestational BMI below 18 kg/m², maternal age under than 25 years, and maternal comorbidities such as HDP or fetal distress are at higher risk of delivering LBW infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.