Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185890›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Caregiver Empowerment Interventions for Post-Stroke Incontinence: A Narrative Review of Chinese and International Practices.

Yuping Jiang, Lihua Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuping JiangSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Lihua WangSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review systematically analyzes the current status and characteristics of caregiver empowerment interventions for post-stroke incontinence (PSI) globally, with a focus on Chinese and international practices. Key research dimensions include: the types, manifestations, and impacts of caregiver burden; the classification and implementation features of empowerment intervention models; the effectiveness of evidence-based empowerment nursing strategies; and emerging development trends in this field. The findings reveal that PSI caregivers commonly face multi-dimensional burdens, which significantly impair their quality of life and long-term caregiving sustainability. Empowerment-oriented nursing interventions have shown consistent positive effects in improving caregivers' care competence, reducing care-related stress, and enhancing the quality of PSI care. However, three critical limitations persist: the absence of unified standardized intervention protocols, large variability in the selection and application of caregiver/patient assessment tools, and insufficient long-term outcome evaluations. Future research should prioritize three directions: developing personalized intervention frameworks tailored to caregiver burden types and patient incontinence severity; constructing integrated multidisciplinary collaboration models; and promoting the application of digital health tools to address time/geographic barriers. Additionally, greater attention should be paid to strengthening caregivers' mental health support systems and optimizing social assistance mechanisms. This review provides a solid theoretical basis and practical strategic references for guiding subsequent research on PSI caregiver empowerment and promoting the translation of research findings into clinical and community practice.

Indexed as

caregiverempowerment nursingincontinenceintervention researchnarrative reviewstroke

Identifiers

PMID41185890
PMCPMC12579835

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.