ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Complementary Strategies for Temporal Lifting Techniques: Biomechanical Insights From Combined Injection Techniques.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining and measuring 'Lift' in soft tissue filler-based facial rejuvenation: a critical review and proposed framework.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Complementary Strategies for Temporal Lifting Techniques: Biomechanical Insights From Combined Injection Techniques.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the use of hyaluronic acid-based soft tissue fillers in the lateral facial region is known to have full-face aesthetic effects, systematic comparisons of injection techniques remain limited.
aimsTo compare the full-face effects of posterotemporal lifting alone and combined with supraperiosteal zygomatic arch injection, and to evaluate the use of images from three device types for aesthetic assessment.
methodsData from 20 female Asian patients (group A, 38.0 ± 6.29 years; group B, 41.5 ± 6.72 years) was analyzed retrospectively. Group A received single-point subcutaneous posterosuperior temporal injections, and group B additionally received supraperiosteal zygomatic arch injections. Outcomes were assessed using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and three-dimensional (3D) quantifications of volume and vector changes in the medial (maxillary and medial mandibular regions) and lateral [temporal region (superolateral face) and lateral mandibular region (inferolateral face)] face. GAIS ratings of images obtained with three device types were compared.
resultsMean local (superolateral, inferolateral, and medial face) surface volume changes were 0.46 ± 0.36, 1.16 ± 1.03, and 0.03 ± 0.55 cubic centimeter (cm
conclusionCombined temporal lifting with supraperiosteal zygomatic arch injection may achieve better facial lifting effects than simple temporal lifting performed with the same filler volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.