Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187155›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Leveraging public engagement to improve healthcare quality: The role of community and stakeholder engagement in Colombia's National Quality of Care Strategy.

Kayla A Benjamin, Breanna K Wodnik, Emily Cordeaux, Laleh Rashidian, María Isabel Riachi, Lauren E Smith, Mariana Morales Vazquez, Jeremy Veillard, Beverley M Essue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kayla A BenjaminInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4405-8254
Breanna K WodnikInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-0194
Emily CordeauxInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4486-1707
Laleh RashidianInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2914-655X
María Isabel RiachiWorld Bank Group, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Lauren E SmithInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mariana Morales VazquezInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeremy VeillardInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Beverley M EssueInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-4634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public engagement, also referred to as community and stakeholder engagement (CSE), and high-quality care are core components of strategies to achieve universal health coverage (UHC), one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. As part of the movement toward achieving UHC, Colombia has developed one of the first national quality of care strategies in the Latin America and Caribbean region. However, the degree to which public engagement was considered in the development and implementation of Colombia's National Quality of Care Strategy (the Strategy) is not clearly understood. With a growing global consensus on the importance of public engagement in health systems and policy, we use a qualitative case study comprising a document analysis followed by qualitative interviews, to explore how CSE has been considered in the design and implementation of the Strategy. In an analysis guided by the Lavery framework for CSE, we address the following three research objectives: 1) describe how community and stakeholder engagement is reflected in the Strategy; 2) explore approaches undertaken to engage community and stakeholders in the development and implementation of the Strategy and their perceived effectiveness; and 3) report on strengths and opportunities for improving CSE in health policymaking in Colombia. Our findings demonstrate a strong written commitment to CSE. However, the implementation of engagement strategies fell short in including community (i.e., patients and citizens), particularly those from structurally marginalized communities, due in part to inconsistent political and financial support and the absence of evaluation mechanisms. These findings have important implications for Colombia and other comparable jurisdictions aiming to enhance public engagement in health policy making. Our study highlights the need to move beyond symbolic participation toward inclusive, well-resourced, and systematically evaluated engagement strategies.

Identifiers

PMID41187155
PMCPMC12585033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.