Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187923›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

The hidden biodiversity knowledge split in biological collections.

Gabriel Nakamura, Bruno Henrique Mioto Stabile, Livia Estéfane Fernandes Frateles, Matheus Lima Araujo, Emanuel Bruno Neuhaus, Manoela Maria Ferreira Marinho, Melina de Souza Leite, Aline Richter, Liuyong Ding, Tiago Magalhães da Silva Freitas and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gabriel NakamuraDepartment of Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5144-5312
Bruno Henrique Mioto StabileUniversidade Estadual de Maringa , Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-537X
Livia Estéfane Fernandes FratelesPrograma de pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Goias , Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-5425
Matheus Lima AraujoUniversidade Federal de Goiás , Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9111-725X
Emanuel Bruno NeuhausInstituto Tecnologico Vale Desenvolvimento Sustentavel , Belém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-7585
Manoela Maria Ferreira MarinhoBiosciences Institute, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-666X
Melina de Souza LeiteDepartament of Ecology, Universidade de Sao Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-0667
Aline RichterCentro Nacional de Conservação de Répteis e Anfíbios, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservacao da Biodiversidade , Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6385-153X
Liuyong DingYunnan Key Laboratory International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Secoruty, Yunnan University , Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5490-182X
Tiago Magalhães da Silva FreitasUniversidade Federal do Pará-Campus Breves , Breves, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3203-3408
Bruno SoaresInstitute of Environmental Change & Soci, University of Regina , Regina, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-0403
Weferson Júnio da GraçaUniversidade Estadual de Maringá , Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8925-5629
Mario R MouraDepartamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraiba , João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7369-7502
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-FilhoDepartamento de Ecologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Goiás , Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0967-9684

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465610/2014-5 and 409197/2024-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás 201810267000023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological and evolutionary processes generate biodiversity, yet how biodiversity data are organized and shared globally can shape our understanding of these processes. We show that name-bearing type specimens-the primary reference for species identity-of all freshwater and brackish fish species are predominantly housed in Global North museums, disconnected from their countries of origin. This geographical divide creates a 'knowledge split' with consequences for biodiversity science, particularly in the Global South, where researchers face barriers in studying native species' name bearers housed abroad. Meanwhile, Global North collections remain flooded with non-native name bearers. We relate this imbalance to historical and socioeconomic factors, which ultimately restrict access to critical taxonomic reference materials and hinder global species documentation. To address this disparity, we call for international initiatives to promote fairer access to biological knowledge, including specimen repatriation, improved accessibility protocols for researchers in countries where specimens originated and inclusive research partnerships.

Indexed as

BiodiversityFishesMuseumsAnimalscolonial legacyichthyological collectionsknowledge distributionname bearersreference materialtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID41187923
PMCPMC12585892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.