ArticleNature communications2025
Computational signatures of uncertainty are reflected in motor cortex excitatory neurochemistry.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grand challenges for systems neuroscience: perspectives and opportunities.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Computational signatures of uncertainty are reflected in motor cortex excitatory neurochemistry.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How individuals process and respond to uncertainty has important implications for cognition and mental health. Here, we use computational phenotyping to examine inter-individual differences in uncertainty processing in relation to neurometabolites and trait anxiety in humans. We introduce a categorical state-transition extension of the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter to model individuals' evolving beliefs about transition probabilities in a four-choice probabilistic sensorimotor learning task with a reversal. Using 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, we measure neurotransmitter levels in the primary motor cortex. Model-based results reveal dynamic belief updating in response to environmental changes. We further find region-specific relationships between baseline primary motor cortex glutamate+ glutamine levels and prediction errors and volatility beliefs. High trait anxiety is associated with faster post-reversal responses. This study establishes a direct neurochemical correlate of hierarchical belief updating, identifying motor cortex glutamate + glutamine as an important neural marker of inter-individual differences in uncertainty processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.