ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic prediction in soft-tissue sarcomas using deep learning and digital pathology of tumor and margin areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Deep Learning Radiomics Model for Preoperative Prediction of High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Multicenter MRI Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Margin Identification Methods in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The histological FNCLCC grade is the primary prognostic factor in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) but fails to fully capture high risk patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model to predict metastatic relapse-free survival (MFS) using digital hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 308 STS patients from two cancer centers, divided into a training cohort (149 patients) and two independent validation cohorts (64 and 95 patients). Supervised multi-instance learning convolutional neural network models were trained on distinct tumor regions-center (C), periphery (P), and margins (R)-to optimize predictive performance. Univariable analysis showed DL models using tumor center (DL-C), periphery (DL-P), and their combination (DL-CP) were consistently associated with MFS across cohorts, while models incorporating margins (DL-R and DL-CPR) demonstrated less reliable associations. Multivariable Cox regression confirmed that high risk scores from DL models were independent predictors of MFS. The DL-CP model outperformed FNCLCC grading in prognostic accuracy, with c-indices ≥ 0.74 in validation cohorts. Adding tumor margin information did not improve predictions.DL models focusing on tumor center and periphery provide superior prognostic value in STS, offering a streamlined, effective approach for digital pathology-based risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.