Observational studyMedicine2025
Metformin use despite contraindications in metformin-associated lactic acidosis.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic licensing at the dendritic cell-NK cells immune synapse in viral asthma exacerbations.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) was a rare but important adverse event of metformin therapy and carried a high mortality rate. In most of reported cases, MALA occurred because of one or more patient associated contraindications for the drug were overlooked. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of MALA patients between the avoidable, unpredictable or combined metformin contraindications. During the study period, 91 patients with MALA and admitted to intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. Most patients had combined metformin contraindications (n = 47), followed by groups of unpredictable (n = 36) and avoidable (n = 8). The distribution of most selected outcomes between avoidable, unpredictable, and combined metformin contraindications had no significant statistical difference between these 3 groups. Only patients with vasoactive support presented the significant difference between 3 groups (P = .0149). In addition, the association between each outcome and 3 metformin contraindications groups indicated no statistical difference. In conclusion, for patients with metformin contraindications which were avoidable, unpredictable or combined avoidable and unpredictable, there was no significant difference of clinical outcome. Therefore, MALA prognosis may not be related to the metformin therapy for different types of metformin contraindications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.