ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2025
Temperature profiles in adult intensive care unit patients treated for infection in a tertiary intensive care unit: A single-centre prospective observational cohort study.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate temperature profiles in patients treated for infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) to establish the number of patients who might be eligible for a clinical trial of therapeutic warming. Design setting and participants: A prospective observational study was conducted in a Wellington ICU over a 3-month period in 2024 including consecutive adult unplanned admissions and excluding those with brain injury or seizures. Main outcome measures: We screened 200 eligible patients. Our primary outcome was the proportion of all unplanned ICU admission episodes where patients were treated for infection within 14 days in the ICU. Patients treated for an infection were divided into four groups (≥38.3 °C, ≥37.5-38.2 °C, 36-37.4 °C, and <36 °C) using their most recent temperature prior to the first antimicrobial in the ICU (or at admission for patients already on antimicrobials). A key physiological/process measure was the fever deficit, defined as the number of degree-hours <38.3 °C within 24, 48, and 72 h. Results: A total of 43.3% of unplanned ICU admissions resulted in treatment of infection within 14 days. A total of nine of 123 patients had a body temperature ≥38.3 °C (7.3%) when first treated for infection in the ICU, while 94 of 123 patients (76.4%) had a body temperature <37.5 °C. Fever deficits over 24-, 48-, and 72-h periods increased by decreasing body temperature group with a high proportion of hours spent with a body temperature <38.3 °C in all groups. Conclusion: A large number of patients treated for infection in the ICU may be able to be included in a trial evaluating induced hyperthermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.