Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41190015›Full record

ReviewOncology reviews2025

Liquid biopsy in gastrointestinal oncology: clinical applications and translational integration of ctDNA, CTCs, and sEVs.

Rita Palieri, Maria De Luca, Francesco Balestra, Giorgia Panzetta, Claudio Lotesoriere, Federica Rizzi, Angela Dalia Ricci, Rita Mastrogiacomo, Maria Lucia Curri, Luigi Andrea Laghi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rita Palieri *Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS "S. de Bellis", Bari, Italy.
Maria De Luca *Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS "S. de Bellis", Bari, Italy.
Francesco BalestraLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS "S. de Bellis", Bari, Italy.
Giorgia PanzettaLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS "S. de Bellis", Bari, Italy.
Claudio LotesoriereMedical Oncology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "S. de Bellis" Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Federica RizziInstitute for Chemical-Physical Processes, Italian National Research Council (IPCF)-CNR SS Bari, Bari, Italy.
Angela Dalia RicciMedical Oncology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "S. de Bellis" Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Rita MastrogiacomoInstitute for Chemical-Physical Processes, Italian National Research Council (IPCF)-CNR SS Bari, Bari, Italy.
Maria Lucia CurriDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Luigi Andrea LaghiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Gianluigi GiannelliScientific Direction, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS "S. de Bellis", Bari, Italy.
Nicoletta Depalo *Institute for Chemical-Physical Processes, Italian National Research Council (IPCF)-CNR SS Bari, Bari, Italy.
Maria Principia Scavo *Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology IRCCS "S. de Bellis", Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive tool to detect actionable mutations, monitor minimal residual disease (MRD), and guide therapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We critically review the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) across GI malignancies and propose a framework for their integration into clinical practice. Methods: We synthesized evidence from over 200 studies, including prospective trials and translational research, to assess diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and clinical actionability of each biomarker type in esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and biliary cancers. Results: ctDNA has shown strong potential for MRD detection and treatment monitoring, particularly in colorectal and pancreatic cancer. CTCs offer insights into metastatic risk and therapeutic resistance, while sEVs provide molecular cargo relevant to immunomodulation and disease progression. Emerging microfluidics and AI-driven multi-omics approaches may overcome current limitations. Conclusion: The integration of liquid biopsy technologies into GI oncology holds promise for early detection and precision therapy. We propose a five-phase clinical roadmap and outine the key research gaps that need to be addressed before widespread implementation in routine care.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cells (CTC)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)extracellular vesicles (EVs)gastrointestinal cancer (GI)liquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41190015
PMCPMC12580207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.