ReviewOncology reviews2025
Liquid biopsy in gastrointestinal oncology: clinical applications and translational integration of ctDNA, CTCs, and sEVs.
Review in Oncology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Residual Disease Detection and Postoperative Surveillance in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biological and Targeted Therapies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Pancreatic Cancer-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Remodel Hepatic Pre-Metastatic Niche via Hybrid Epithelial-Mesenchymal States.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- From Cellular Radiosensitivity to Precision Radiotherapy: Integrating Functional Assays, Genomics, and Clinical Modeling.Cancers · 2026Review
- Gastric Cancer: Pathobiology and Therapeutics.MedComm · 2026Review
- Autophagy-Circulating Tumor DNA Axis in Molecular Cancer Research: Emerging Mechanisms, Therapeutic Targeting, and Translational Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From Spatial Epigenomes to Clinical Diagnostics: Integrative Methylomics Across Scales and Modalities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Metabolic collusion driving immune evasion in cholangiocarcinoma: unmasking the dual control of the immuno-metabolic microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive tool to detect actionable mutations, monitor minimal residual disease (MRD), and guide therapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We critically review the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) across GI malignancies and propose a framework for their integration into clinical practice. Methods: We synthesized evidence from over 200 studies, including prospective trials and translational research, to assess diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and clinical actionability of each biomarker type in esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and biliary cancers. Results: ctDNA has shown strong potential for MRD detection and treatment monitoring, particularly in colorectal and pancreatic cancer. CTCs offer insights into metastatic risk and therapeutic resistance, while sEVs provide molecular cargo relevant to immunomodulation and disease progression. Emerging microfluidics and AI-driven multi-omics approaches may overcome current limitations. Conclusion: The integration of liquid biopsy technologies into GI oncology holds promise for early detection and precision therapy. We propose a five-phase clinical roadmap and outine the key research gaps that need to be addressed before widespread implementation in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.