Evidence mapPaperPMID 41190066Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Therapeutic cancer vaccines in pancreatic cancer.

YuHan Wang, Peng Huang, Chun Li, ShengJin Tu, Hua Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

YuHan WangDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Peng HuangDivision of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chun LiDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
ShengJin TuDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Hua YangDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and unfortunately, the prognosis for this stubborn tumor type has remained bleak for an extended period. Current treatment options are limited and often ineffective, highlighting the need for innovative therapeutic strategies. Research in tumor immunotherapy has advanced significantly over the past few decades, leading to numerous studies progressing to clinical evaluation. Cancer vaccines are regarded as a promising therapeutic approach for treating pancreatic cancers. Cancer vaccines offer distinct advantages, especially for patients who are unresponsive to other treatments, as they can elicit broad and long-lasting T cell responses. This review offers a thorough examination of recent preclinical and clinical results of therapeutic cancer vaccines in pancreatic cancer therapy, highlighting the recent advancements in vaccine delivery platforms. Despite ongoing clinical efforts to develop cancer vaccines, there has not been a breakthrough in clinical outcomes, primarily due to substantial challenges including the low mutation burdens, the assessment of immune responses in preclinical models, and the intrinsic resistances to cancer vaccines. By tackling these challenges, cancer vaccines can expand the possibilities of personalized immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesImmunotherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccinesclinical applicationimmunotherapypancreatic cancertumor antigenvaccine

Identifiers

PMID41190066
PMCPMC12580372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.