Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41190283›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Uganda's evolving national biosafety system: lessons from the past 30 years.

B M Zawedde, M Kwehangana, I Ongu, A W Ibanda, P Wasswa, A Kiggundu, C Mugoya, D Kasule, A M Makara, D Hafashimana and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

B M ZaweddeSecretariat, National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Entebbe, Uganda.
M KwehanganaResearch Management and Quality Assurance, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, Kampala, Uganda.
I OnguScience Foundation for Livelihoods and Development, Kampala, Uganda.
A W IbandaUganda Biotechnology and Biosafety Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
P WasswaCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
A KiggunduNational Livestock Resources Research Institute, NARO, Wakiso, Uganda.
C MugoyaTarget Malaria Project, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
D KasuleCorporate Affairs and International Collaborations, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, Kampala, Uganda.
A M MakaraScience Foundation for Livelihoods and Development, Kampala, Uganda.
D HafashimanaEnviro-Impact and Management Consults, Kampala, Uganda.
T SsengoobaAtiri Agri-Bio Solutions, Kampala, Uganda.
H K OlokaAtiri Agri-Bio Solutions, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uganda has made progress towards developing a functional biosafety system. The system has evolved in the past three decades to enable substantial application of modern biotechnology in different sectors. Key informant interviews were used to capture tacit knowledge from respondents who were identified to have vast knowledge and experience of the biosafety system of Uganda in the past 30 years. Secondary data was then used to fill the gaps in the knowledge map. From the findings we were able to identify the key drivers of policy reforms that shaped the evolution of the biosafety regulatory system; policy, institutional developments, partnerships, public participation and engagements milestones that contributed to developing the biosafety system in Uganda. We discuss the lessons learnt and their implications for on-going and future biosafety policy and legal discourse. We share some strategic recommendations that we believe if implemented will enable Uganda, and other developing countries, to put in place a coordinated and evidence-based regulatory system, which is required for effective application and adoption of the current and emerging biotechnologies. Uganda's case study is also a learning experience for countries that are in the process of establishing biosafety frameworks.

Indexed as

africabiotechnology regulationcompetent authorityGMOsscience outreach

Identifiers

PMID41190283
PMCPMC12580632

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.