ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation (CDG) are severe disruptions in the synthesis of glycoconjugates, resulting in inherited metabolic conditions. These multisystem diseases, typically inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, have an occurrence rate of approximately 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 50,000 live births. The clinical presentation of CDG is highly varied and complex, with neurological symptoms being predominant, affecting multiple organ systems. The process of glycosylation, a critical post-translational modification, is tightly controlled by proteins encoded by over 250 genes, and mutations in any of these genes are known to cause CDG. The discovery of new associated genes over recent years has accelerated; comprehensively characterizing these, especially rare ones, will aid in identifying novel therapeutic targets, improving prognostic evaluations, and developing effective treatments. In vitro models (such as cell lines or patient-derived "clinical-grade" cells) are essential for advancing CDG research. Notably, 60% of defects affecting N- or O-glycosylation impact the eyes, leading to photoreceptor degeneration and cell death. The 661W cell line, derived from immortalized mouse retinal cells and expressing specific ocular markers, serves as a valuable experimental model to study the ocular involvement in CDG. Methods: In this study, we utilized the 661W cell line to explore the molecular consequences of a homozygous variant in the ALG2 gene (c.752G>T; p.Arg251Leu), which encodes the enzyme α-1,3-mannosyltransferase. Following transfection with a plasmid carrying the variants of the gene of interest ALG2 p.Arg251/p.Arg251, we carefully evaluated changes in gene expression using RT-PCR and Western blotting. Results: Our results suggest that the 661W cell line may serve as a useful model for examining the potential impact of a specific mutation, supporting a possible link between the mutation's molecular effects and clinical disease progression. Discussion: These findings could provide valuable insights to inform the development of targeted therapeutic strategies within the framework of personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.