SynthesisAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2026
Demographic Composition of Participants in Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy Studies Across the Globe: A 20-Year Systematic Review.
Synthesis in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), including Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Turner syndrome (45,X), XYY syndrome, trisomy X (47,XXX), and rarer tetrasomies and pentasomies, affect approximately 1 in 400 births and are associated with a wide range of developmental, cognitive, and physical health outcomes. While clinical research on SCAs has expanded over the past two decades, it is unclear whether the populations included in these studies reflect the demographic diversity of those affected. Assessing representation is critical to ensuring research findings are generalizable and applicable to diverse patient populations. We conducted a systematic review of global clinical research on SCAs published in English between January 2004 and May 2024. Searches were performed in Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they enrolled ≥ 10 participants and excluded if they were case reports, reviews, or meta-analyses. We extracted data from 1474 studies on geographic location, participant karyotypes, and demographic metrics, including race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) reported. Trends in demographic reporting were examined over time and by geographic region. For US-based studies reporting race/ethnicity, we compared pooled participant demographics to national census data. SCA research is concentrated within a small number of geographic areas, primarily in Europe (51.4%) and the United States (23.6%). Reporting rates of race or ethnicity for US papers increased over the 20-year observation period, with an average increase of 1.5% ± 0.4% per year (p = 0.003), peaking in 2024 with 61.4% of US-based papers presenting demographics. When reported, studies consistently overrepresented White non-Hispanic (p < 0.001) and college-educated (p < 0.001) participants relative to US census benchmarks. This systematic review reveals persistent gaps in the demographic reporting and representation of participants in SCA research. Even in the United States, where population diversity is high, published studies do not reflect the expected racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic makeup of affected individuals. To ensure that research findings are equitable and clinically relevant, future studies should adopt standardized demographic reporting and prioritize inclusive enrollment strategies to reflect the full spectrum of individuals with SCAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.