ArticleAppetite2026
Predictors and correlates of eating in the absence of hunger at age 12 months.
Article in Appetite, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behaviors observable during the eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) protocol may be useful early indicators of an emerging avid eating phenotype, but have not been examined in infancy. This study videotaped infants being offered desserts (e.g., cakes, donuts) after a meal, measured intake, and coded observed behaviors (variety, eating duration, rate, latency, and engagement, bite size, positive affect before and after tasting, latency to negative affect, and negative affect and resistance when dessert was taken away), which were scored to generate a 12-point eating avidity index (EAI). Sociodemographics, eating behaviors (Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire-Toddler (CEBQ-T) subscales and food-related tantrums), and dietary sweets intake were reported and anthropometrics measured. Multiple linear regression was used to predict intake and EAI from covariates. Infants (n = 118) ate M = 86.6 kcals in M = 5.55min after a latency of M = 0.63min; 28 % displayed positive affect before tasting and 73 % after, and 13 % displayed negative affect when dessert was taken away. Intake was positively associated with variety, eating duration, rate, and engagement, and bite size. Intake and avidity for eating dessert were predicted by CEBQ-T enjoyment of food and dietary sweets intake, but not by sociodemographics or adiposity. Intake was predicted by food-related tantrums. During the EAH protocol, many infants demonstrated multiple behaviors reflecting an eating style high in food approach, and many of these behaviors, with the exception of affect, correlated with intake and one another and may reflect an emerging avid eating phenotype. Identifying the etiology and moderators of this avid eating phenotype would inform prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.