Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193208›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Separation after childbirth and the psychological, social and physical implications: ethnographic insights from a neonatal intensive care unit.

Michella Bjerregaard, Anna Axelin, Ingrid Poulsen, Anne Brødsgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michella BjerregaardDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark michella.runge.kjoebeloev.bjerregaard.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-8284
Anna AxelinDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ingrid PoulsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anne BrødsgaardDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the context of separations among mother, father and infant after childbirth, with a focus on the psychological, social and physical implications of these separations.

designA short-term ethnographic study, which included participant observations and informal interviews. Data were analysed by a partly deductive content analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman.

settingA '27-bed' Danish neonatal intensive care unit.

participantsThe study included parents (n=19) who had an infant in need of intensive care and were separated after childbirth.

findingsThe study identified an overarching theme of navigating family dynamics, caregiving and emotional challenges during separation. Three interconnected subthemes-Physical and virtual bonding as a necessity, Nurturing and caregiving shifts and Collective emotional impact of separation-shed light on the disjointed and emotional nature of parent-infant separation in neonatal care.

conclusionsThe findings revealed that the first hours in the neonatal intensive care unit were often characterised by disjointed rather than unified care, as nurses balanced their focus across the family while parents navigated the emotional strain of separation. Organisational and structural barriers further challenged reunification, highlighting the need for care models prioritising proximity, family bonding and minimised separation.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalAdultAnthropology, CulturalDenmarkEmotionsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMothersObject AttachmentParturitionQualitative ResearchFamilyNeonatal intensive & critical careNursing CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID41193208
PMCPMC12587916

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.