ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Aerosol and intranasal delivery of monoclonal antibodies to prevent transmission in pig influenza infection models.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why pigs might help us develop better vaccines and drugs against influenza virus.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Article
- Human and porcine IgG subclasses differentially engage porcine Fc receptors.Discovery immunology · 2026Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Outer Membrane Proteins Confer Protection Against Tuberculosis.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an urgent need for robust animal models to assess novel therapies that prevent the transmission of respiratory pathogens. We developed two complementary pig influenza models, direct and contact challenge, to evaluate the ability of monoclonal antibodies to block transmission. Using the strongly neutralizing 2-12 C mAb targeting H1N1pdm09 haemagglutinin, we established a benchmark for comparing mAb delivery routes and platforms. Intravenous administration of 2-12 C consistently showed the highest efficacy in the direct challenge model. The contact influenza challenge model, which best mimics natural exposure, was further optimized by evaluating key parameters, including timing of co-housing, infectious dose, and delivery routes. Aerosol and intravenous delivery of 2-12 C were equally potent, preventing infection in contact animals, while intranasal delivery prevented infection in some but not all animals. The pig direct and contact influenza challenge models provide powerful platforms for the evaluation therapeutic strategies to prevent influenza disease and transmission in humans.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.