ArticleScientific reports2025
Interlimb training improves motor function in partial-hand but not necessarily transradial simulated prosthesis use.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of empirical approaches for functional rehabilitation during the acute and subacute stages following upper limb amputation is needed. For persons with unilateral limb loss, interlimb training is a potentially attractive approach, as it may allow for the translation of learned function from the unaffected to affected side while awaiting prosthesis fitting. Persons with sound limbs performed simple and complex reach-to-grasp motor tasks using a body-powered transradial or partial-hand prosthesis simulator in a 5-day interlimb training paradigm. Prior work in a single-session paradigm found improvments in motor control with prosthesis simulators, with an especially strong effect in partial-hand device use. Here, we hypothesized that participating in interlimb training would result in improvements in motor control with the prostheses, particularly in partial-hand device use and during complex tasks. Overall, partial-hand prosthesis users showed greater performance adaptations with interlimb training than transradial prosthesis users, who tended to show no improvements following training in either task. We also found that partial-hand users showed significantly higher reach peak velocities compared to transradial users following training in both the simple and complex task. These results suggest that interlimb training may provide tangible benefits during early-stage rehabilitation following upper limb amputation, especially in cases of partial-hand loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.