Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193601›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Enhanced large language models for effective screening of depression and anxiety.

June M Liu, Mengxia Gao, Sahand Sabour, Zhuang Chen, Minlie Huang, Tatia M C Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

June M Liu *Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Human Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-3606
Mengxia Gao *Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Human Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sahand SabourThe CoAI group, DCST; Institute for Artificial Intelligence; State Key Lab of Intelligent Technology and Systems; Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhuang ChenThe CoAI group, DCST; Institute for Artificial Intelligence; State Key Lab of Intelligent Technology and Systems; Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Minlie HuangThe CoAI group, DCST; Institute for Artificial Intelligence; State Key Lab of Intelligent Technology and Systems; Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. aihuang@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-1849
Tatia M C LeeLaboratory of Neuropsychology and Human Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. tmclee@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9992-6609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepressive and anxiety disorders are widespread, necessitating timely identification and management. These conditions manifest through various emotional and behavioral symptoms, such as persistent sadness and excessive worry. When left undiagnosed and untreated, these disorders can cause severe consequences, including increased risk of suicide and substantial socioeconomic burden. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer potential solutions, yet high costs and ethical concerns about training data remain challenges.

methodsThis paper introduces a pipeline for synthesizing clinical interviews, resulting in 1,157 interactive dialogues (PsyInterview), and presents EmoScan, an LLM-based emotional disorder screening system. EmoScan distinguishes between coarse (e.g., anxiety or depressive disorders) and fine disorders (e.g., major depressive disorders) and conducts high-quality interviews.

resultsEvaluations show that EmoScan exceeds the performance of base models and other LLMs like GPT-4 in screening emotional disorders (F1-score = 0.7467). It also delivers superior explanations (BERTScore=0.9408) and demonstrates robust generalizability (F1-score of 0.67 on an external dataset). Furthermore, EmoScan outperforms baselines in interviewing skills, as validated by automated ratings and human evaluations.

conclusionsThis work highlights the importance of scalable data-generative pipelines for developing effective mental health LLM tools.

Identifiers

PMID41193601
PMCPMC12589491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.