SynthesisJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2025
The effectiveness of transcranial electrical stimulation in individuals with specific learning disorder (SLD): systematic review and transfer analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review aimed to investigate the transferability of transcranial electrical Stimulation (tES) interventions in individuals with specific learning disabilities (SLD) based on the FIELD model, encompassing function, implements, ecology, level, and durability. A systematic search of electronic databases yielded a total of 13 eligible studies, 11 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 1 transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), and 1 transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), encompass 286 individuals with SLD, for inclusion. The overall effect size analysis revealed positive transfer effects in all domains of FIELD, indicating the potential effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulations (NIBS) interventions in enhancing various aspects of learning and behavior in individuals with SLD. The subgroup analysis further underscored the positive impact of age, dose, and concurrent intervention on transferability. In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights into the transferability of tES interventions and holds promise for improving learning and behavioral outcomes in individuals with SLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.