ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis and chronic kidney disease.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital acute kidney injury in patients with lung cancer complicated with sepsis: clinical and nursing applications.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Machine learning methods identified cellular senescence-related hub molecules in sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and their upstream regulatory network.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for fall risk in older adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality in this high-risk population remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with sepsis and CKD.
methodsPatients diagnosed with both sepsis and CKD were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm. Multiple ML models were developed, including logistic regression (LR), decision tree, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), neural network (NN), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), along with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for comparison. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and average precision (AP). The best-performing model was externally validated in an independent cohort from the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) and further interpreted using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP).
resultsA total of 4,686 ICU patients with sepsis and CKD were included in the development cohort. Among the models, XGBoost demonstrated the best performance with an AUC of 0.911, AP of 0.771, specificity of 96%, and sensitivity of 62%. In the external validation cohort of 3,718 patients, XGBoost also achieved excellent predictive performance with an AUC of 0.855. Model calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical utility. The top 20 predictors were visualized and ranked based on SHAP values.
conclusionsMachine learning models, particularly XGBoost, can accurately predict in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis and CKD. These models may assist clinicians in risk stratification and decision-making for this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.