ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Longitudinal study of knee pain amongst workers in the Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic outcomes of cryotherapy plus Graston Technique on pain and activities of daily living in individuals with knee pain.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee pain is common in the general population, increasingly so with age. It causes substantial disability which can lead to premature exit from the workforce. Current epidemiological data on knee pain prevalence in working-age populations are limited, particularly concerning the interplay of occupational, psychosocial, and cultural factors. To address this, in a large group of workers, we examined the prevalence of knee pain longitudinally, its relationship with pain at other sites and personal and occupational risk factors for pain at follow-up.
methodsData came from the CUPID study, a cohort study including people aged 20-59 years at work from 18 countries in broadly three types of occupations: office work, nurses and manual workers. Baseline data were collected on knee pain, pain at other anatomical sites, occupational characteristics and psychosocial aspects of work. Follow-up information about knee pain was obtained approximately a year later. Descriptive statistics were used to describe knee pain prevalence and characteristics as well as persistence. Poisson regression was used to explore baseline factors in relation to knee pain, and disabling knee pain, at follow-up.
resultsIn total 9,161 workers provided baseline and follow-up data, amongst whom 28% reported knee pain in the past year and 21% knee pain in the past month at baseline. 79% of workers with knee pain reported disability. The prevalence increased with age and was higher among women. Only 8% of workers with knee pain had single-site pain. There was wide variation in the prevalence rates reported amongst workers even doing broadly similar work. Psychosocial and occupational work demands predicted knee pain at follow-up, as did poorer mental health and somatisation but the highest effect size was found amongst people reporting a high number of painful sites at baseline (PRR: 2.06,95%CI: 1.78-2.39).
conclusionsKnee pain is prevalent in the workforce, even at younger ages. It is commonly persistent and disabling. Given its link with work disability, the emphasis needs to be on prevention and both mechanical and psychosocial exposures at work are implicated. However, like low back pain, other factors appear to be important, particularly pain at other sites.
trial registrationClinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.