ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Microvascular Health as a Key Determinant of Organismal Aging.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Heterogeneity of Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Elderly Patients with Advanced NSCLC under the Background of Immunosenescence and Intervention Strategies].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- The Extracellular Matrix in Liver Regeneration: Biological and Therapeutic Insights.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fibrillin-1 Orchestrates a Pro-senescent Niche Driving Peritubular Endothelial Senescence via ZEB1/endothelin-1/β-catenin Signaling.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Decoding Vascular Senescence: Cellular Insights and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Microvascular Health as a Key Determinant of Organismal Aging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging is a complex, multifaceted process affecting all organ systems, with vascular aging playing a central role in organismal health decline. Beyond its role in circulation, the vascular system acts as a dynamic interface between tissues, influencing countless physiological functions such as tissue regeneration and repair, immune responses, and metabolic balance. Importantly, age-related vascular impairment-characterized by a peculiar set of endothelial aging hallmarks-exacerbates age-related diseases (ARDs) such as cardiovascular disorders, neurodegeneration, chronic kidney disease, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis. This review combines basic concepts of angioscience and aging biology with translational interventions to devise clinical strategies promoting a functional rejuvenation of old and compromised blood vessels, fostering the prevention, delay or treatment of ARDs. Starting from the description of the cellular and molecular mechanisms driving vascular aging, a cutting-edge perspective on the organ-specific vascular impairment and its impact on tissue function is offered. Given the central role of the vasculature in aging, how targeting vascular aging through pharmacological, genetic, and lifestyle interventions holds promise for mitigating its systemic consequences and improving healthspan is discussed. Finally, how the combination of animal models (e.g., parabiosis) and novel microphysiological systems, coupled with multi-omics and artificial intelligence-driven analyses, is advancing the field toward the identification of strategies that promote vascular resilience and extend healthspan, addressing one of the most pressing biomedical challenges of a worldwide aging population is highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.