Evidence mapPaperPMID 41194471Full record

ReviewJournal of neurochemistry2025

Activation of the AMPK Signaling and Brain Function: A Friend or Foe?

Noelle Isabella Nicol, Tao Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noelle Isabella NicolDepartment of Internal Medicine-Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Tao MaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073823NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG082388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a central regulator of cellular energy balance, and its activation presents a therapeutic strategy for various metabolic diseases and neuronal disorders. Yet its effects on brain function remain unclear. This review evaluates evidence from animal and human studies examining AMPK activation through pharmacological agents (synthetic or natural compounds) and exercise. The effects of AMPK activation on synaptic and cognitive function seem highly context-dependent. Peripheral or acute AMPK activation often improves cognition, whereas chronic or central nervous system (CNS) activation can impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Collectively, current studies underscore the need for rigorous research distinguishing peripheral versus central AMPK activation, clarifying isoform-specific signaling, and examining effects in healthy human populations.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein KinasesBrainSignal TransductionAnimalsCognitionEnzyme ActivationHumansNeuronal PlasticityAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAlzheimer's diseaseAMPKAMPK activatorcognitionmemorysynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41194471
PMCPMC13421047

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.