ArticleVeterinary dermatology2026
A Novel Topical Emollient Plus for Canine Atopic Dermatitis: A Clinical Trial Assessing Efficacy and User Acceptance.
Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Some of the Newest Therapeutic Methods in Canine Atopic Dermatitis.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCanine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a common, chronic skin condition characterised by epidermal barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation and cutaneous dysbiosis. While 'emollient plus' formulations are widely used in human atopic dermatitis (hAD), their role in cAD remains underexplored. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and owner-perceived value of a novel emollient plus formulation as a co-adjuvant treatment for cAD. ANIMALS: Twenty-one client-owned dogs with controlled, nonseasonal cAD completed the study. MATERIALS AND
methodsA proof-of-concept, bench-to-bedside study was conducted over 30 days. Dogs received a once-daily application of a novel emollient plus formulation developed in-house. Clinical outcomes were assessed using pruritus Visual Analog Scale (pVAS)10 and Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI)-04 scores, alongside skin barrier function parameters (trans epidermal water loss [TEWL] and pH) at the pinnae and inguinal areas. Owners evaluated therapeutic efficacy via the Owner Global Assessment of Treatment Efficacy (OGATE) questionnaire and sensorial acceptability through a survey.
resultsSignificant reductions were observed in pVAS10 (4.25 ± 1.85 to 3.38 ± 1.79; p = 0.016) and CADESI-04 (24.62 ± 18.48 to 13.43 ± 7.44; p = 0.02) scores. TEWL (18.63 ± 17.33 to 9.56 ± 10.75; p = 0.049) and pH (6.07 ± 0.97 to 5.41 ± 0.71; p = 0.01) only had significant reductions at the pinnae. Owner satisfaction was exceptionally high, with 90.47% rating treatment efficacy as 'good to excellent'. The sensorial properties of the formulation also received consistently positive ratings. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This cAD-targeted emollient product demonstrated promising efficacy in reducing pruritus and skin lesions while possibly improving skin barrier function. Its favourable safety profile and high owner satisfaction suggest strong potential for routine clinical use in the management of cAD. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm efficacy and optimised treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.